STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

    Option to input load values in STAAD as a function F(x) where x varies ( e.g x= depth)

    In recent times, I have been designing a large number of buried underground structures. (I figured many Engineers may have similar experiences on this too). For buried structures, a few of the applied loads are a function of a single variable i.e....
    Ola Joda almost 3 years ago in  1 Future consideration

    Display of Inactive Objects

    Provide an option to allow the model displayed in the Post Processing workflow to be adjusted and have all objects that have been inactivated removed from the view. This would be a load case dependant attribute, which means that if a set of member...
    Carlos Aguera almost 3 years ago in  0 Future consideration

    IMPLEMENTATION OF 4 PLATE WITH DIFFERENT THICKNESS

    There is no option for 4 plates or tube beams with different thickness. Also, it could be fantastic an option with tapered tube section with different flange width or thickness
    Guest 12 months ago in  1 Already exists

    Automate the option of dynamic wave pressure

    There is a webinar for modelling, analysis and design of rcc rectangular water retaining structure along with impulsive and convective wave pressure on coffee corner, but there are some limitations and assumptions, like the xml templates are only ...
    Sahil Shaikh almost 4 years ago in  4 Will not implement

    Shrink diagram enhancement

    It would be helpful if the Shrink command under Structure Diagram would only shrink the members with released ends. This would make the diagrams look more like a design drawing and would make it easier to check that you have released the right mem...
    Nick Wilde 12 months ago in  1 Future consideration

    ASEC7 vertical structural irregularities check

    The STAAD.Pro now can not check the the vertical structural irregularities 5a/5b in the ASCE 7 table 12.3-2 by ant command stream, but as the code demand, the designer need check this irregularities, it is very difficult and cost time for designer...
    Guest about 2 years ago in  1 Needs review

    Steel Design Parameters in Modeler

    I assume this has been mentioned before (might even be working on it) but being able to specify the steel design parameters in the Physical Modeler would be a game changer. A separate design module would be good too (sorta how RCDC works), but I d...
    Ryan Freund about 4 years ago in  1 Future consideration

    Use a CAD file as background layer in Physical Modeler

    Create the ability to use a .dwg or .dxf file as a background when using Staad Physical Modeler. Have clickable nodes in background. Have the ability to place that background at different elevations.
    Ryan Freund about 4 years ago in  3 Future consideration

    Include Aluminum Design Results in Report

    Philip Bamu with PCB International, LLC requests that the STAAD.pro Report functionality be updated to include aluminum design results.
    Phil Riegel about 1 year ago in  1 Future consideration

    For concrete design, DESIGN LOAD case should show to critical load case, regardless if minimum rebar is enough

    When I model a concrete column in Staad.Pro, and perform the design, if the minimum rebar, lets say 1% is good enough for all load cases, the design load reported in the screen is the first load case. I understand because that rebar is OK for all ...
    Saul Cuen about 1 year ago in  1 Planned