Skip to Main Content
STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Implementation of IS18168 for steel design in STAAD Pro

No description provided
Vinayak Prabhavalkar over 1 year ago in  1 Planned

OPENSTAAD ACCESS TO STANDARD SHAPE DATABASE

As of now the standard way to access to steel database is to the Legacy one or to the user table. There's no way to drive OpenStaad to the Standard database. This improvement would be highly welcome, Thanks Pierfranco Mocchetti
Guest 3 months ago in  1 Already exists

Accidental Torsion under Seismic Loads:

Currently, accidental torsion analysis is only supported when using the Standard response spectrum excluding Eurocode, which needs to be specified. The functionality is not available for Custom spectra, which is a critical limitation that needs to...
Rashmi Ramachandra over 1 year ago in  1 Future consideration

AutoDrafter - Save as PDF

Please allow option to save drawings from AutoDrafter to PDF.
Michael Duncanson over 1 year ago in  0 Needs review

AutoDrafter - Allow Base Plate Plan

There is currently no way to create a base plate plan in AutoDrafter. Please add it.
Michael Duncanson over 1 year ago in  0 Needs review

Need the provision for Stainless steel Structure Design as per En 1993-1-4.

We need to design platforms for chemical industry where the material is Stainless steel and we cannot design as per EN 1993-1-4.
Gourishankar Badiger 6 months ago in  0 Needs review

Show Utilization ratio for concrete members as is shown for steel members

“Utilization ratios are not currently displayed during the design of RCC members in STAAD.Pro. Including this feature would be highly beneficial for engineers, as it would allow quicker assessment of member efficiency and overall design performance.”
Guest 6 months ago in  1 Future consideration

Cold formed Member design to EN 1993-1-3

Many STAAD users in Singapore and Malaysia have requested to implement the cold formed member design to EN 1993-1-3. We have lost some prospects to competitors because of the absence of this code in STAAD.Pro. This may be a feature that is request...
Madhan Elumalai about 4 years ago in  3 Future consideration

Enhanced Beam End Force Filtering for Beam‑Node Ranges and Groups

When reviewing beam end forces in STAAD, the Results Setup dialog does not behave intuitively when the range is defined by node number. For example, in a simple 3‑span line model, if I want to review the shear on the RHS of the second support (Bea...
Brett Wyman 10 months ago in  1 Already exists

GUI customization for utilization ratios

Viewing the utilization ratios in the GUI is very cumbersome when evaluating the analysis results. Please consider the following updates to the GUI interface. 1) The ability for user to change the decimal points on the screen labels (0.01 is prefe...
Guest 10 months ago in  1 Already exists