STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

ADD A NEW IDEA

STAAD.Pro

    Showing 477 of 477

    BUG REPORT REPRESNTAION

    Previously, STAAD provided detailed bug reports through the following link: https://bentleysystems.service-now.com/community?id=kb_article_view&sys_kb_id=453e131c47b7ea507798d4fe536d43e8.However, currently, STAAD only shows a one-line descript...
    RAHUL BRIJPUIYA 2 months ago in  1 Needs review

    Indicate of number of LOAD LIST ENVELOPE

    As shown in the attached screenshot, the STAAD program does not display the load list envelope numbers, which causes inconvenience for users. Please improve this feature.
    Guest 9 months ago in  3 Future consideration

    Add code checks for AISC 370

    There is a new code for Stainless Steel that has been published by AISC. It would be nice to incorporate the code checks for AISC 370 for materials that have been selected as stainless steel.
    Dallin STRONG over 3 years ago in  10 Future consideration

    Staad.Pro 2025 Serviceability Check include section from Mexican Tables

    Serviceability check doesn't work when using sections from Mexican Tables or prismatic sections producing the error: "To use this tool the model should have section profiles and materials assigned to all members." When I change all my sections to ...
    Saul Cuen 5 months ago in  1 Already exists

    Add possibility to include B1 factor in Code checking Parameters with AISC 360 First Order Method

    As per actual possibility provided by AISC 360, it is possible to perform design with Direct Analysis Method but also Effective Length Method and First Order method. In some case it is useful to do analysis with First order method (Dynamic Seismic...
    Jean Gorsse 10 months ago in  0 Needs review

    Inclusion of SS EN 1998-1 Seismic Action & Accidental Torsion

    Application of seismic action (including accidental torsion) for structure in Singapore using EN 1998-1 is cumbersome. Request to include this code in future development.
    Guest about 1 year ago in  2 Needs review

    Request to make "Result Utilization Ratio" editable

    Could you please make the 'result utilization ratio' field directly editable? Currently, it's set to a default of 1, but we need to set values like 0.9 or 0.95. While it's possible to adjust this using a detailed diagram, the values changes with e...
    Kanagarasu Kandasamy 5 months ago in  4 Already exists

    Cold formed Member design to EN 1993-1-3

    Many STAAD users in Singapore and Malaysia have requested to implement the cold formed member design to EN 1993-1-3. We have lost some prospects to competitors because of the absence of this code in STAAD.Pro. This may be a feature that is request...
    Madhan Elumalai over 3 years ago in  3 Future consideration

    Provision of Effective Elastic Section Modules, Plastic Section Modules and beta values in output file while calculating bending capacity of slender member as per IS: 800-2007 (LSD)

    In general, Most of PEB companies design the web as Slender members if the project location is in low seismic region. In such cases when we give the design report to consultant for approval, we get comment that web area is considered in calculatin...
    vijay krishna 10 months ago in  0 Needs review

    Change units in Reports

    Need the ability to choose the units used in a report. Currently, my reports use kips and inches. When the density of material is shown it is listed as 0.000 because it is displaying to 3 decimal places. To show the value you have to change format...
    Randy Killian 3 months ago in  1 Needs review