Skip to Main Content
STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 319 of 319

Rigid member

Add a default section and material to be used as a rigid member in lieu of OFFSET. Make sure that profile and material are bein created in such way that the deflection of rigid member is as less as it can be without any warning.
Guest over 4 years ago in  1 Already exists

Provide wind generation on Fireproof Members

STAAD does not consider the additional width of the fireproofed members; producing underestimated wind generated loads for open structures like piperacks. Please include this feature as this would make several of my colleagues happy.
Guest over 4 years ago in  0 Future consideration

nonlinear pushover

Please tell me Can Staad do a nonlinear pushover analysis for concrete structures? Also, Can Staad do a nonlinear dynamic time history analysis for concrete structures? Thanks
Guest over 4 years ago in  1 Will not implement

MASONRY

Please I suggest to add MASONRY structures analysis & design in the next version of STAAD .
Guest over 4 years ago in  1 Future consideration

Interactive Graphical Icon Display of Multiple Support conditions

On STAADPRO Connect Edition, the graphical display of support icon does not update in corresponding current load condition. It only shows the latest support definition whatever load case is being selected. Although forces and design results are sh...
Guest over 4 years ago in  1 Future consideration

I section. Tapered versus User Table

I found that when I use USER TABLE with AISC 2010 or 2016 the values of table B4.1b are wrong. The limit lambda r for non compact and slender flange is not o.k. Is it possible to review those values for the USER TABLE? Thanks
Guest over 4 years ago in  1 Will not implement

HERRAMIENTA DE BANAMEX CONTRA INTRUSOS BLOQUEA STAAD.PRO

HOLA, BUEN DÍA, INSTALÉ LA HERRAMIENTA DEL BANCO Y AL ACCEDER AL STAAD.PRO CONNECT EDITION, SE QUEDABA "VOLANDO" FUI AL ADMINISTRADOR DE TAREAS Y VI QUE EL RAPPOR(ETC) DE LA HERRAMIENTA CONTRA INTRUSOS DE BANAMEZX, QUE SUMINISTRA IBM, MANTENÍA EL ...
Guest over 4 years ago in  1 Will not implement

Don't switch views when picking different tab

Often when clicking on a different tab, say going from "Geometry" to "Properties" for example, STAAD will change the view in the graphics window. Please, please, please do not change the view when switching between tabs.
Randy Killian over 4 years ago in  1 Planned

Custom equivalent lateral force procedure and seismic definition/custom model response in Staadpro CE

I am tasked with designing a steel support structure in Staadpro connect edition. As part of the design, I need to conduct a seismic analysis of the frame. The steel structure is 12 m high and needs to be designed according to the New Zealand seis...
Guest over 4 years ago in  1 Future consideration

Curtailment of section in all three axes

We are using STAAD Pro for optimizing our designs. We deal in steel structures & we need to optimize it by curtailment in all the three axes, presently we can do curtailment in the web depth ( Taper I section). We want to reduce the width of t...
Guest over 4 years ago in  1 Future consideration