STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Cold formed Member design to EN 1993-1-3

Many STAAD users in Singapore and Malaysia have requested to implement the cold formed member design to EN 1993-1-3. We have lost some prospects to competitors because of the absence of this code in STAAD.Pro. This may be a feature that is request...
Madhan Elumalai almost 4 years ago in  Future consideration

AISC Seismic Provisions. Print Warnings for TRACK 0

This idea is submitted on behalf of Melvin Nicolas, from Siemens. Currently, STAAD.Pro does not print any warnings when the SEICMIC 1 and TRACK 0 commands are assigned. If the TRACK 2 command is introduced, many new warnings may be printed in the ...
Ricardo Pichardo 3 months ago in  Future consideration

Include reactions from control nodes in the Statics Checks summary

This idea is submitted on behalf of Michael Mills from Payne-Huber Engineering STAAD.Pro won't currently include the reactions from Control Nodes in the Statics Check. Although this is documented (TR.28.1 Control/Dependent Specification), it can l...
Ricardo Pichardo 3 months ago in  Future consideration

Make the detailed AISI design output available in the Reports Workflow

This idea is submitted on behalf of Cameron Empey from Betchtel. There's no way to include the TRACK 2 AISI output in the report. Please make that an available item to add. PBI Ref:1785991
Ricardo Pichardo 3 months ago in  Future consideration

Indicate of number of LOAD LIST ENVELOPE

As shown in the attached screenshot, the STAAD program does not display the load list envelope numbers, which causes inconvenience for users. Please improve this feature.
정모 고 about 1 year ago in  Future consideration

Implement code check according to 1999-1-1 (Eurocode Aluminium)

There is no aluminium code check for european users. Also the only aluminium code available is the American standard Aluminium design manual 1994 edition, which is outdated. Code check equivalent to EC1993-1-1 would have been highly appreciated.
Oyvind Fredriksen 6 months ago in  Future consideration

Make Staad Multi Processor (Multi-Threaded)

This would cut down the analysis time required by STAAD significantly. If it is too much work to change the solver code to benefit from multi-threads, can at least each basic load or each load combination be run at a different thread? There's no r...
Rafael Salgado over 3 years ago in  Future consideration

Physical Modeler for Wind Load ASCE 7-22 Attributes Assignment

Designers of buildings using the Physical Modeler would benefit since they need to use the current ASCE 7-22 code.
Milton Manos 7 months ago in  Future consideration

Wind Loading on Tapered Sections

Dear Colleagues, // STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition - Version 22.12.00.142 // there was a situation where we had to find out the lateral forces due to wind on a light pole (tapered profile) and provide suitable support for the same. Wind was applied usi...
Dani Paul about 3 years ago in  Future consideration

Steel AutoDrafter Implementation Required

Dear Sir / Madam, Steel Auto Drafter is not giving beam presentation as per Releases provide in Analytical Modelling. Please check attached screenshot for your ready reference. Steel AutoDrafter drawings should be as per Release and Analytical mod...
Keyur Patel over 2 years ago in  Future consideration