STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal
Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.
You have 3 options for providing feedback:
Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.
Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.
Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!
When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!
Thank you for the clarification. Yes, we can add an item into the backlog to allow configuration of the gaps between objects detailed in the drawings to be specified in the Drawing Style Manager
Thank you for your reply.
The gaps are not the same on all connections. Basically, as you say, different values need to be set for each member type below.
beams-columns, secondary beam onto primary beam, bracing members, etc.
To achieve this, we believe the program can determine from the member specification.
Secondary beam:Member release
Bracing members:Truss member(Tension member)
The original user request is to set separate gaps for release and truss member.
This request was originally posted to SR No:7001518603. Please see also that SR.
Please let me know if you need more information.
Thank you for your comment. What I am looking to clarify is how any modification can provide the most value. The problem that has been identified that this would address is that although the drawings are created with a gap between beams and columns, on many situations, you have to manually change this gap and that can take a long time as it has to be done on many junctions. If it was a user configuration value, then the user can set it once and all the junctions would have the same value, 10mm, 20mm or whatever they wanted. Thus it will save hours of work as there can be 100s of such connections on each model. My follow up question however, are the gaps the same on all connections? Or should there be different values for different types of connection, e.g. 10mm for beams-columns, 20mm for secondary beam onto primary beam, 30mm for bracing members, etc?
The clearance between beams and columns is almost always not 20mm.
Generally, it is often 10mm.
Therefore, after exporting the CAD file, all connections require editing in CAD.
In particular, diagonal braces are difficult to edit.
If this feature is added, it will save a lot of time.
Competing software is already strengthening CAD file output.
It is one of the necessary features for STAAD to win the competition.
This is not really an idea. What is the problem that this is trying to solve?
When drawing, the offset distance is not an actual value, but some value (e.g., 100 mm).
If this is possible, it would be very convenient.