STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Needs review
Created by Dani Paul
Created on Apr 6, 2025

RELATED IDEAS

Editor : Outlining - Collapse / Expand

Not sure if that's a glitch or an advantage; noticed that in STAAD.Pro 2024 version 24.00.02.354 while the collapse button only collapses, the expand button can both expand and collapse; so, may be we can have only one big button like the contents and rename that 'Toggle Outline' so that it can act as its name suggests 🤔

Expand-2.jpg
Expand-1.jpg
Collapse.jpg
NOCS_Panel-Beam...
Expand-2.jpg
Open full size
Expand-1.jpg
Open full size
Collapse.jpg
Open full size
NOCS_Panel-Beam.STD
 NOCS_Panel-Beam.STD
Open full size
Expand-2.jpg Expand-1.jpg Collapse.jpg NOCS_Panel-Beam.STD
  • Admin
    Carlos Aguera
    Reply
    |     Apr 7, 2025

    Thank you for posting here, although you are right in suggesting that you have observed a behaviour that is not as intended. The purpose of the ideas portal is to share suggestions that would help really provide engineers an capability that will provide a significant improvement to their ability to deliver a project with STAAD.Pro. I am sure you would agree, this does not fall into that camp. However in this case, it will be shared with the team and I would expect it will require only a small modification. In future, please log observations like this as a service case.