STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jan 1, 2021

RELATED IDEAS

Assigning DJ1 / DJ2 to a model to define start/end of members must improve

To be forced to go assign both a node # and every member between 2 nodes for a few beams is not a big deal but when it's a giant model, it takes days to assign these values for deflection checks.

Something must be done to make this more user friendly and easier to define a member's full length in lieu of 100s of DJ1/DJ2 lines of code for models not using Physical members

  • Admin
    Carlos Aguera
    Reply
    |     Aug 19, 2022

    Thank you for posting this idea. I do appreciate how challenging this is with large more complex models. As you say the solution is greatly simplified when dealing with physical models as this provides the necessary relationship needed to know which segments associate together which is needed in determining the assignment. The question I would put to you is how would you determine the necessary relationship which could then be programmed?