Skip to Main Content
STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

Status Needs review
Created by Sujaan Ahamed Fareed
Created on Aug 15, 2024

Full integration with AutoPIPE and STAAD

Pipelink is quite rudimentary. It does not provide the ability to assign guide supports to different nodes. For example, horizontal loads need to be applied to Vertical Members, while vertical loads need to be applied to Horizontal Members. The same would be true for pipe Anchors. It is inaccurate to apply all the loads to a single node.

Additionally, AutoPIPE Nonlinear analysis generates a significant number of primary loadcases, and STAAD should have a way of developing ASCE Load combinations using all the loads directly from AutoPIPE.

  • Sujaan Ahamed Fareed
    Reply
    |
    Oct 1, 2024

    Per your suggestion, if we defined releases on the sliding base plates, how would we capture the shear effect of friction?

  • Admin
    Carlos Aguera
    Reply
    |
    Oct 1, 2024

    Thank you for posting this idea. However, there are two suggestions which would be better posted as separate ideas so that the true value of each can be identified from supporting votes. Your idea is basically to have a new object added to STAAD to represent a special type of connection arrangement. I would say that you would be better explicitly defining this connection using three dummy members which have the load transfer mechanics defined in their end releases. Then your piping connection is made to the pipe connection point. E.g. the dummy member that is below the pipe point is defined with FY and FZ releases to prevent shear transfer. Then the lateral beams are also given FY and Z releases, but as horizontal members, they wont transfer vertical forces. Basically, create the connectivity as structural objects.

    1 reply