STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal
Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.
You have 3 options for providing feedback:
Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.
Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.
Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!
When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!
Hello Carlos, Thank you for replying to the idea.
We don't use the CHANGE command actively, so looking for a CG for our one model (or the last state model mentioned in your reply) would do the job. But including the CG for each of the model may be more inclusive.
Thank you for posting this idea. However, perhaps you might provide some more details on this as you can imagine, there would be challenges in determining exactly what objects are included/excluded in any such calculation. Consider a model defined with a set of members some of which have been set as INACTIVE, a set of load cases defined and solved, a CHANGE command issued and a different set of members set as INACTIVE, a new set of load cases defined and solved. In the above scenario, would you expect the CG to be that of the initial or last state of the model? The last would seem reasonable or are you suggesting that there should be a method to get from OpenSTAAD what models exist (i.e. 2 in the above example) and the CG for each model?