Skip to Main Content
STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

Status Already exists
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 7, 2024

Better integration of physical members in Analysis Model

When a physical member is created, STAAD should handle the collection of beams as one entity. When a section of material is assigned, it should always be to the physical member. End releases will only exist at the ends of the physical member. Currently, properties and attributes can be assigned to beams AND to members. It is possible to have a physical member that is defined as a W10x22, and one of the individual beams is defined as W4x13. Which section prevails? An end release can exist for a beam is not located at the end of a physical member. Will a hinge be created in the middle of the physical member? These scenarios are very unrealistic.

  • Admin
    Carlos Aguera
    Reply
    |
    Mar 8, 2024

    Thank you for posting your idea here, although your idea already exists. That is to define the model in the Physical Workflow. that way all the definitions associated with the members are defined as physical entities.