STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Future consideration
Created by Ola Joda
Created on Feb 9, 2024

RELATED IDEAS

Annotate Plate Stresses (Mx, My, Mxy, SQx, SQy)

Within the Annotation Menu, could you include Plates Stresses & Nodal Forces ?

This will be very useful to display specific plate /nodal results during compilation of Structural reports. Given that the contours only show a range of values. This range could be very large sometimes a bit general.

Please incorporate additional Tabs to:

  1. Annotate plates center stresses results (Mx, My , Mxy, SQx, SQy) and an option of "drop down filter" to display these results for "at least one" user selected Load case

  2. Also, Add a new tab to annotate "Element nodal forces" ( currently this is only available through PRINT ELEMENT FORCES). This would display the "total contribution" of all forces in Global direction from surrounding/adjacent plates which are connected to that specific node.

Thanks

Annotate Plates...
Annotate Plates Results.jpg
Open full size
Annotate Plates Results.jpg
  • Ola Joda
    Reply
    |     Mar 12, 2024

    You are welcome Carlos. It would definitely be great to include Solids too. Thanks

  • Admin
    Carlos Aguera
    Reply
    |     Mar 8, 2024

    Thank you for providing this idea. Yes, this seems like a reasonable addition to compliment the other methods provided for nodes, beams and reactions. I would also say that this idea should also include solids too. This will be added to the backlog.