Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.
You have 3 options for providing feedback:
Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.
Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.
Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!
When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!
The issue was found to be the result of a logic issue which has been addressed and resolved in the STAAD.Pro 2023 release
Thank you for posting this idea. This is somewhat at odds to the general feedback we have had which is that the analysis and design routines should be segregated because making any change to the design means that the analysis results are invalidated. This can be frustrating as whilst it is right to re-run the design, it doesnt need the analysis to be re-run. If the two processes could be segregated, doing quick checks and modifications could become more dynamic. In the current framework, if changing parameters does not invalidate the results, then this is an issue that neds to be addressed which needs to be investigated.