Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.
You have 3 options for providing feedback:
Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.
Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.
Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!
When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!
Ok, even if there is an option to change orientation of group of elements, that will work. While modelling we take care of orientation, but some how if we can change the local axis of groups then, application of Wood AMER for plates will be smooth.
--
Ankur Jain
Thank you for posting this idea. Whilst the idea of being able to individually modify the direction of a plate's local access might seem useful, it would potentially be a difficult and awkward system to manage trying to determine the right orientation especially when dealing with surfaces using triangular meshes. A more manageable system is having a consistent axes system for a given surface which is meshed, so no matter what the individual plate local axes is, it should be able to report the results for the defined surface. We have moved in that direction by providing the local surface coordinate system in the Physical Modeller. In due course this system will be used to report plate results.