Skip to Main Content
STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

Status Planned
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 18, 2022

Automatic effective length calculation

Users
  • Attach files
  • Admin
    Carlos Aguera
    Sep 2, 2022

    Correct. Assigning design parameters is currently in the domain of the analytical workflow.

  • Dallin Strong
    Sep 1, 2022

    But currently this is not how it is set up, right? The physical modeler does everything but set up the design parameters. Which is still done in the Analytical modeler.

    I just want to make sure that I am not missing some functionality within the physical modeler that could make my life easier.

  • Admin
    Carlos Aguera
    Aug 30, 2022

    The first step in this solution will be for the Physical Model to take ownership of setting design parameters. That means that similar to modelling and geometry functions, that becomes restricted in the analytical environment. Then we can build a system that can automate the parameters for various attributes such as effective length and deflection lengths.

  • Dallin Strong
    Aug 26, 2022

    Just for clarification, does the physical model tell the analytical model the Lx, Ly, and Lz values? Likewise, does it also tell it DJ1 and DJ2 values? My understanding of the modeling was that it doesn't do that. At least if I view the design commands in the analytical model (after converting from the physical model), it won't have those values defined.

    I feel like the poster was asking for something like that.

  • Admin
    Carlos Aguera
    Aug 18, 2022

    Thank you for your post. I think the first part is really about accounting for the fact that you are looking to retain the concept of a physical beam or column even if it has to be sub-divided for analytical purposes. That is already addressed by defining your model in the physical workflow. If I understand correctly, your suggestion in the second and third points is about automatically calculating the effective length factors, we do have this in our backlog. The factors themselves being determined by the stiffness of the members that it is connected to in the two orthogonal axes.

  • Guest
    Aug 18, 2022
    In staad pro CE, in analytical modeler, when we add new node/s,the existing member is devided into segments, and the program takes length/effective length of that member as part, not takes as a whole member length about its major or minor axis accordingly, so my suggestion is that, 1-kindly add the features that program automatically take the length of member (beams and columns)as per its division on major or minor axis accordingly...... 2- like steel structure, the effective length of beams and columns should be automated in RCC structure 3-Also in steel structure design effective length factor Ky and Kz is to be provoided manually after confirming moment release or reatrained, translation is release or restrained, and also the major and minor axis, this manual efforts is so applied to each and every member and thqt is time consuming, error prone and tedious, so kindly add that feature.