Skip to Main Content
STAAD.Pro Ideas Portal

Welcome to the STAAD.Pro Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 427 of 427

Multiple mass models/ seismic analyses for design

Many codes, particularly IS 1893 part-2 and IS 3370 part-2, the RCC elevated/underground water retaining structure should be analyse and design in "TANK ENPTY" and "TANK FULL" both of the conditions, but staad pro seismic definition whether it is ...
Sahil Shaikh almost 3 years ago in  2 Future consideration

implement front to front angle configuration in STAAD

In India many Columns are made with 4 leg of angle with lacing of rod or angle(built-up) STAAD have option of design back to back but it is not have front to front angle configuration
Rahul Brijpuriya about 1 year ago in  2 Will not implement

ADD the slenderness ratio to the normalized ratio

If the slenderness ratio meets the requirements, but its normalized ratio is not shown in the utilization table, can the slenderness ratio be added to the utilization table, which will help the designer to understand the condition of the member.
Guest about 1 year ago in  1 Needs review

Provide detailed calculations and formulas

Can you provide calculations which are similar to the connection design, i.e. include detailed calculations as well as formulas?
Guest about 1 year ago in  2 Will not implement

mass Load generator in Physical Modeller

It would be useful if Mass Model generator is included in physical Modeller.
Mr Vijayarathnam about 1 year ago in  1 Needs review

CONCRETE BEAM WITH A HOLE IN STAAD PRO

As we know in R.C structures we may need to provide holes in beam for service purposes. I am here attaching a book showing examples on the design of beams with holes. [View:/cfs-file/__key/telligent-ideas/03d5f738-7ee6-4ff2-9384-201f3d5dd0d9/Concr...
Joseph Lucas Magare over 3 years ago in  1 Future consideration

Member property display units- Shift+X

In spite of selecting Metric units for member section properties at the beginning of a new model (considering Indian codes), while checking the member sections during modelling and analysis, the member properties are getting displayed in FPS units...
ABHISHEK Ramesh 7 months ago in  1 Already exists

It is hoped that the number of decimal places for the section thickness display can be increased to three, or the display unit of the section can be controlled.

No description provided
Guest 7 months ago in  1 Needs review

automated loading for intz tank

automated tool for hydrostatic loading should be included
Guest about 1 year ago in  1 Needs review

Function to Apply Hydrostatic Pressure using OpenSTAAD

It will be helpful if a function for applying the hydrostatic forces on plate elements either by selecting a group of plates or a selecting a single plate e.g., the PlateID and the pressure at four corners of the plate. Many a times applying the p...
Srinivasa Rao Masanam almost 2 years ago in  2 Already exists